Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)
|
  
 
Subject:
C-4 Shock Question
From: "Charlie" <cpappas(at)houston.rr.com>
Subject: C-4 Shock Question
Lines: 60
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:27:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.175.104.30
________________________________________________
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C35F4B.4FA56090
I broke my left front shock and would have to order just about any shock =
except the Sensatrak.
Has anyone used the Monroe Sensatrak shocks on their C-4? How do they =
compare to the stock Bilsteins?
--=20
Charlie
1993 Convertible Corvette
cpappas(at)houston.rr.com
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C35F4B.4FA56090
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I broke my left front shock and would have to =
order just=20
about any shock except the Sensatrak.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Has anyone used the Monroe Sensatrak shocks on =
their=20
C-4? How do they compare to the stock Bilsteins?</FONT></DIV><FONT =
face=3DArial>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR>Charlie<BR>1993 Convertible Corvette<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:cpappas(at)houston.rr.com">cpappas(at)houston.rr.com</A><U><FONT=
=20
color=3D#0000ff></FONT></U></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><U><FONT color=3D#0000ff><BR>---<BR>Outgoing mail is certified =
Virus=20
Free.<BR>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (<A=20
href=3D"http://www.grisoft.com">http://www.grisoft.com</A>).<BR>Version: =
6.0.504 /=20
Virus Database: 302 - Release Date:=20
7/24/2003</FONT></U></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C35F4B.4FA56090--
From: "DH" <darkhalo(at)1corvette.com>
Subject: Re: C-4 Shock Question
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.115.69.213
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:51:22 GMT
________________________________________________
stick with the Bilsteins, its worth the wait. Ive used both and the
difference is nite and day. Id use sensatraks in ordinary cars but never in
my vette.
DH
"Charlie" <cpappas(at)houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:j0xZa.154244$TJ.9056965(at)twister.austin.rr.com...
I broke my left front shock and would have to order just about any shock
except the Sensatrak.
Has anyone used the Monroe Sensatrak shocks on their C-4? How do they
compare to the stock Bilsteins?
--
Charlie
1993 Convertible Corvette
cpappas(at)houston.rr.com
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003
From: "Charlie" <cpappas(at)houston.rr.com>
Subject: Re: C-4 Shock Question
Lines: 50
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:05:53 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.175.104.30
________________________________________________
I decided to do both, got the Monroe`s so that the car is back on the road
as my daily driver. When I said I broke a shock, the whole top half was
gone except for the part of the rod that goes through the top rubber
grommets with the nuts on it and the bottom half was bent up but there.
Ordered the Bilsteins from Mid America and will now be able to do them at my
leisure.
Thanks
--
Charlie
1993 Convertible Corvette
cpappas(at)houston.rr.com
"DH" <darkhalo(at)1corvette.com> wrote in message
news:en_Za.696$9Y6.454(at)newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
> stick with the Bilsteins, its worth the wait. Ive used both and the
> difference is nite and day. Id use sensatraks in ordinary cars but never
in
> my vette.
>
> DH
>
> "Charlie" <cpappas(at)houston.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:j0xZa.154244$TJ.9056965(at)twister.austin.rr.com...
> I broke my left front shock and would have to order just about any shock
> except the Sensatrak.
>
> Has anyone used the Monroe Sensatrak shocks on their C-4? How do they
> compare to the stock Bilsteins?
>
> --
> Charlie
> 1993 Convertible Corvette
> cpappas(at)houston.rr.com
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 8/5/2003
Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:
Title: Cars 2
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:19:37 +0000
Author: crazydeeps
More on: http://crazydeeps.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/cars-2/
____________________________________________
Title: 9/25/2009 --it hits the fan
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:07:41 +0000
Author: seamorg
Today the world buzzes with reports of a secret nuclear site somehow unearthed in Iran (I haven’t heard how exactly this unfolded quite yet), and the dilemma: how to “punish” a country that is already knee deep in sanctions? An NPR piece summarized the following problem: even with the current multilateral sanctions on Iran, Iran’s GDP is estimated to grow 2% next year. Trade with Iran continues through Dubai. Clarification: just because the GDP grows, don’t mean the average man sees it. Average Iranians have lived with high unemployment, low income for years; the source was unclear whether this is thought to be an effect of the sanctions or of mismanagement [will post NPR link soon].
A few things to think about:
1. It is wrong to talk flippantly about how to punish a country. Iranians screamed out to the world that they are not their leaders and are prepared to die to change the actions of these leaders. We need to figure out how to punish/regulate the leaders, in partnership with the people.
2. There have never been complete sanctions on Iran and there probably will never be.
The unrecognized elephant in the room is that, if we were really to punish Iran and specifically Iranian leaders, we would stop them from selling oil. In order to do that, of course:
the rest of the world needs to stop using so much oil.
How silly of course. It’s easier to prohibit an entire nation (74million) of people from buying and selling the things they need for survival, such as: antibiotics, scholastic jourals, airplane parts, food, and even to consider military intervention, than to organize sanctions that would affect Iran’s leaders. A freeze on Iran’s oil would be harsh; but why not free up access to basic goods and freeze up the sale of oil. You’d see how quickly things change. More on: http://iranelectionstories.org/2009/09/26/9252009-it-hits-the-fan/
telefony komórkowe nokii n85 własne radio internetowe Kręgi betonowe firany Nostalit
| 
