Categories:
See Also:

Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)






LeftLetterRight





German versionFrench version

Subject:
Re: c-4 AC Bolower ? / Please Help

From: "JG" <flht95(at)hotmail.com>

Subject: Re: c-4 AC Bolower ? / Please Help

Lines: 29

Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:51:33 -0700

NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.180.171.206

________________________________________________











"`Key" <Key(at)Ya.Net> wrote in message

news:Lzlpe.27287$PR6.27136(at)tornado.texas.rr.com...

> "JG" <flht95(at)hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:HJ9pe.5963$tr.3969(at)fed1read03...

>>

>> "`Key" <Key(at)Ya.Net> wrote in message

>> news:Qehoe.20953$PR6.5010(at)tornado.texas.rr.com...

>>> thanks in advance for any help. my mechanic seems to be stumped.

>>> have an 84 vette with ac blowing problems.

>>> the ac is blowing cold but the air only comes out the middle vents.

>>> It does not blow out the vents on the ends.

>>> any advice ?

>>>

>>> thanks

>>> --

>>> "Key"

>>>

>> Is this the same Key from the HD newsgroup?

>

> yes

> --

> "Key"

Good luck in getting an answer here. Seems to be a tight crowd that doesn`t

reply to newbies. This crowd is not like the one in the HD group. In there,

you may get a bunch of smart a#* comments your bound to get one that`s

helpful.










Next Topic
From: Greg <not(at)home.now>

Subject: Re: c-4 AC Bolower ? / Please Help

Lines: 16

Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:47:23 GMT

NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.86.135.250

________________________________________________









what year model c4 does it have manual or automatic A/C control?

sounds like you have a air door problem, get me some info and i will

try to help you with it. not trying to be a smart ass but you might

want to get another mechanic, this is not a very complex system.

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:36:00 GMT, "`Key" <Key(at)Ya.Net> wrote:



>thanks in advance for any help. my mechanic seems to be

>stumped.

>have an 84 vette with ac blowing problems.

>the ac is blowing cold but the air only comes out the middle

>vents.

>It does not blow out the vents on the ends.

>any advice ?

>

>thanks








Next Topic
From: "`Key" <Key(at)Ya.Net>

Subject: Re: c-4 AC Bolower ? / Please Help

Lines: 47

Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:29:42 GMT

NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.242.99.172

________________________________________________









"JG" <flht95(at)hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:b1Ppe.9225$tr.4677(at)fed1read03...

>

> "`Key" <Key(at)Ya.Net> wrote in message

> news:Lzlpe.27287$PR6.27136(at)tornado.texas.rr.com...

>> "JG" <flht95(at)hotmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:HJ9pe.5963$tr.3969(at)fed1read03...

>>>

>>> "`Key" <Key(at)Ya.Net> wrote in message

>>> news:Qehoe.20953$PR6.5010(at)tornado.texas.rr.com...

>>>> thanks in advance for any help. my mechanic seems to be

>>>> stumped.

>>>> have an 84 vette with ac blowing problems.

>>>> the ac is blowing cold but the air only comes out the

>>>> middle vents.

>>>> It does not blow out the vents on the ends.

>>>> any advice ?

>>>>

>>>> thanks

>>>> --

>>>> "Key"

>>>>

>>> Is this the same Key from the HD newsgroup?

>>

>> yes

>> --

>> "Key"

> Good luck in getting an answer here. Seems to be a tight

> crowd that doesn`t reply to newbies. This crowd is not

> like the one in the HD group. In there, you may get a

> bunch of smart a#* comments your bound to get one that`s

> helpful.





I know,

I have lurked and participated in this group before.

There are some helpful people here but in my opinion,

if they don`t really know the answer ?

They will just not reply.



that will work for me :-)



g`day to ya

--

"Key"












Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:


Title: Oranges at the Car Show
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:55:13 +0000
Author: seanhenricus

P7254346s1/200   ƒ4.7   ISO 100

.

P7254347s1/60   ƒ4.7   ISO 100


More on: http://seanhenricus.com/2009/09/26/oranges-at-the-car-show/



____________________________________________

Title: Clarification on Previous Post - "Examples All Around" from Sep 22, 09
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:02:09 +0000
Author: TrueManhood

I really appreciate the comment from a reader who asked me to clarify why I think the descriptions from the previously-posted Facebook status update (posted originally on September 22, 2009) was so horrible.  Here goes:

As you can see, the Facebooker updated their status with one of those “quizzes” to rate yourself on “What Movie Badass Are You?”  His initial response was “Guns, Girls and Cars… isn’t that the definition of a badass?”  I first want to mention that most guys want to appear “hard” or, in this case, a “badass”.  It’s that thing inside us, a territorial thing, an “I can kick your butt” thing.  There’s a connotation that goes along with that feeling… that in order to really be hard, you must get as many women as possible, you’ve absolutely got to have a sweet ride and the more guns and ammo you have, the harder you must be.  (I could continue on with other categories – how much money you have, what kind of house you live in, what you do for a living, how many employees you have, how many vacations you take, how much power you hold, how many and what kind of scars you have, etc.)  This is an example of “cultural manliness”. 

The idea of cultural manliness is that, as you accumulate more wealth, as you sleep with more women, as you buy more stuff and as your power “ranking” goes up, the more manly you are.  Cultural manliness never takes into account your virtue, your faith, your relationship with God and/or others, how you treat your wife/children/family/friends/strangers/etc.  Cultural manliness is a facade, a lie, a demeaning and empty way of living.  The glamour of being a “culturally manly” man will wear off in time.  How many people will a culturally manly man hurt along the way?

Back to the post… the description (in this case, of James Bond) mentions traits that might be good, if explained more and in the correct context.  However, in the context they are in, these traits (strong, fast, clever, refined, etc.) lead only to one trait, “…and still get laid in the process.”  These traits aren’t listed in order to positively affect the world or in order for you to become the best man you can become, they’re listed in order to lead towards women sleeping with you.  There is a great disparity between these two distinctions. 

Let me make myself clear here… there’s nothing wrong with being attractive, refined and clever.  There’s nothing wrong with women being drawn to you.  The problem here is that the motivation to be those things and to possess those traits is skewed and misguided.  Deep down, inside every man, there’s an urge to be “manly” – to be courageous and daring, attractive and intelligent.  Listen to what God is saying through your urge to be manly, so that you know what He wants from you.  Once you feel the urge and know exactly what God wants you to do with it, you’ll be living a purposeful life for God!

I hope this clarification helps.

Man up!


More on: http://truemanhood.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/clarification-on-previous-post-examples-all-around-from-sep-22-09/




hale stalowe Noclegi Jastarnia Przechowuj linki Modne torebki fajne prezenty ślubne